Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Benjamin's avatar

Well, I could have said it better Dear Bokeifus, and I have.

Clearly you are both very nearsighted.

hubbchappy wrote:

"I see you failed to mention that Russia was backed into a corner intentionally by NATO, who decided it was a good idea to offer membership to Ukraine, against the promises made to Russia not to do so."

I failed to mention it Hubbie?

Scroll down in the article where I wrote:

"...Putin’s fictions evolved within a short time post invasion with these narratives:

· NATO is infringing on Russian territory – Ukraine itself - and the narrow buffer Ukraine represents is a danger to the Fatherland...."

I also covered the very same issue, taking Russia's view of the fiction here: https://tinyurl.com/yagd9h3z That was in February. Apparently, you are back in February and I've moved forward to October. Actually, if you re-read the article to which you replied, you'll find I'm ahead of the curve by months.

Your sort of comments will work if you've taken an illogical premise (for example, that I failed to mention the NATO issue) logically to your illogical - and false - conclusions. First, I mentioned it, and it is you who failed to pay attention, it is you whose knees are jerking because your god was found deficient, and it is you who likely also failed history and civics.

As for the labs producing viruses, they are another matter, and are a logical fallacy to argue them. So are the other issues you've raised - all outside the scope of this discussion - and which have nothing to do with US' national and security interested in protecting commerce, trade and military passage that supplies the western world across many seas, the Baltic, Mediterranian, Aegean, Black and Azov. The purpose for which NATO was formed, and why the United States, to Tucker's chagrin, is its leading member.

To answer your other questions about what national security interests we have in Ukraine, as well as to address some of your other concerns, these were covered in my other articles. For example:

THE TUCKER FACTOR. https://andrewgbenjamin.substack.com/p/the-tucker-factor

In the same article I bring to your attention the treaty governing the Ukraine-Russia issue, to which Russia is the principle signatory, a treaty it alone violated. That you are unaware of it says much.

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2014/12/04/the-budapest-memorandum-and-u-s-obligations/

https://policymemos.hks.harvard.edu/links/ukraine-budapest-memorandum-1994

The Budapest Memorandum governs European security as I write these words from Budapest.

NATO protects European, as well as American security. The treaty was ratified for the mutual benefit.

All decisions by logical leaders are made in the national and mutual interest.

And when Tucker broadcast from Budapest, I was there at the Matild Palace.

https://tinyurl.com/2kwd2xwb -- SEE THIS: https://tinyurl.com/yfnzb26n

Even at the same dining rooms in the Matild Palace, https://tinyurl.com/2kwd2xwb, as well as Wolfgang Puck's SPAGO of Beverly Hills, also located at the Matild Palace. https://spagobudapest.com/en/

I was also at the very same border entry where Tuck and his camera crew entered Hungary, at Liszt Ferenc Airport. All passengers were checked for having been inoculated for Covid, including Tucker. Otherwise, there would have been no entry for Tucker or anyone else. At least not to Hungary August 2021.

That Tucker denied having been vaccinated is another issue, for another time, and that is not my problem, but perhaps yours.

And you were.....exactly where my friend?

Meanwhile,

TO QUOTE from my article: "NATO guarantees the security of its neighbors. And emerging EU members. The U.S.-NATO alliance guarantee the security of America’s current and future allies in the American Interest - period. ...

As well as, Russia allied itself to terrorist states China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela.

Are these too, in the American interest, Mr. Carlson?..."

How about you Hubbie?

You also stated, "We instigated this fight, by our neglegence through NATO."

Reader Catapult chimed in to second your and Tucker's fairy tales: "NATO goaded Russia into the war with its insistence Ukraine join NATO.."

NATO had nothing to do with Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Moreover, NATO never offered membership to Ukraine, nor invited Ukraine to join it. Not to this day.

If you believe otherwise, please feel free to post the evidence here.

So apparently, and in reflection of Bekeifus' "I couldn't have said it better."

Well, I have just said it better.

There's more: https://tinyurl.com/2cqe4rhq

The photographs of the Russian fleet are by yours truly, near the naval base at Murmansk in the Baltic. The same fleet that blew up Nord Stream.

I was speaking from the border of Ukraine when I wrote most of these articles, just six hour later than your time.

Even if your god has just fallen.

The Nazis, if you failed to click on the hyperlinks, were working not for the Jewish president of Ukraine, but for Putin, https://tinyurl.com/y2lvd24l and he even awarded medals to them. https://tinyurl.com/2km9my4w

Tucker is so far from the truth as a lie can fly.

For example, take this article from March 2022 - as we now have not just the evidence, but history behind us:

https://tinyurl.com/26qlh4wk

To all: I appreciate your thoughts, but if you'll be a foreign policy maven, study your subjects and their history. Also, go back on the articles we are discussing, and as with the rest, click on the orange or blue hyperlinks for validation.

Expand full comment
hubbchappy's avatar

I see you failed to mention that Russia was backed into a corner intentionally by NATO, who decided it was a good idea to offer membership to Ukraine, against the promises made to Russia not to do so. Also forgotten are the multiple labs producing gain of function viruses. How about the fact that Ukraine is the money laundering capitol of the world for the likes of the Biden's and the Pelosi's. This is much more complicated than you make it out to be. We are pumping Billions of dollars into Ukraine without any proper accountability to prop up a president who was installed by the CIA, who is a reprobate actor from a risque TV series. Tell me please what is the strategic interest that we have as a nation to prop them up? We instigated this fight, by our neglegence through NATO. We have morons running our national and international policies, led by an dementia addled president. So Tucker is an apologist for Russia. I think he is more an apologist for common sense.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts