THE SCIF PROBLEM: BIDEN DOJ'S INVESTIGATION MEANT TO EXPOSE JOE BIDEN'S MULTITUDE OF CRIMES MORPHED INTO THE DOJ'S DEFENSE OF JOE BIDEN'S MULTITUDE OF CRIMES...
The Special Counsel is directed and controlled. The results of the Biden Probe were predetermined to turn the investigation exonerating the current president into the conviction of the former....
Makes sense.
The special counsel is directed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Attorney General Merrick Garland who appointed him.
Garland is directed by Joe Biden who appointed Garland. Because he cannot win at the polls, the president will “save democracy and election integrity” by incarcerating his opponent by commanding his weaponized DOJ to do it - which also makes sense.
The AG is the most partisan hack ever, who is in a permanent state of resentment, pique and rage against Republicans who denied him a life term on the Supreme Court of the United States he clearly deserved, the same way Hillary Clinton clearly deserved to be president.
Biden is directed by Susan Rice,
Rice is directed by Barack Obama,
Barry is directed by George Soros and a few other Democrat high-tech billionaires.
The US and global media are directed by the above.
Meanwhile, special counsels appointed by Democrats gave Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton who destroyed 33,000 pieces of evidence, and Sandy Berger who took reams of state secrets out of a SCIF in his socks, and then destroyed them, Get Out of Jail Free Cards.
What is the commonality the media cannot see and the application of law?
They’re all Democrats.
However, the unintended disclosures at the hearings will arguably help Donald Trump more than Joe Biden.
Unlike Trump who faced two impeachments for making a phone call exercising presidential imperative to request an investigation of corruption, and made not a single cent for it, Joe may get KARMA: to be impeached for influence peddling, money laundering, wire fraud, banking fraud, tax evasion, treason and selling state secrets, bribery, corruption and profiteering, pocketing tens of millions, violating election integrity, and possibly other high crimes actually covered in the U.S. constitution.
One clue should slap the citizen, even a partisan one, out of his lethargy.
Throughout the interrogation of the special counsel concerning an investigation not about Donald Trump, but Joe Biden only, Democrats cynically and disingenuously conflated, to cover up for Biden, a case that had nothing to do with Trump.
The Trump case has NOTHING to do with the Biden case! Allegations against one person has nothing to do with the crimes of the other. The only pertinent issue here is the Federal Government’s thumbs on the Scales of Justice, malicious prosecution of a political opponent, and the abuse of power of the regime against half of the American People.
WALL STREET JOURNAL: WHO REALLY RELEASED THE HUR REPORT?
The Biden-Garland-directed DOJ report, as sketchy and disingenuous as it was (didn't exonerate Joe Biden as the media line has it). It was focused on manufacturing serial indictments against Donald Trump.
The name Trump has no business in a federal report of allegations about Biden crimes.
In their constant segues conflating and redirecting one issue with the other, acting as defense attorneys, Democrats in congress with the DOJ front-ran defense for Biden. That was the point!
The wording of the report and the special counsel’s testimony was the defense itself. The special counsel was the President’s lead defense attorney.
We’ve seen this play before, have we not?
Unfortunately for the president, it left a few takeaway points I address here.
We now have corroboration to substantiate the preexisting assumptions surrounding the Biden Crime Family, also see HERE, now turned into evidence that Godfather Biden has serially obstructed the investigations over the years concerning his “mafia’s” profiteering activities, as well as his criminal handling of classified documents.
Allegedly Joe committed more crimes (judged by the standards Trump was charged with) with respect to 1. the duration classified documents held in his possession (decades), 2. the greater frequency classified documents were pilfered and destroyed (and having exposed their contents), 3. the far greater volume of classified documents removed from his possession (truckloads in fact), and 4. whereas presidential immunity-presidential privilege under the constitution’s separation of powers clause could be asserted by a president, a senator and a veep, and a private citizen cannot profit from such excuses. Biden held all three positions during and after the time of the allegations of his document-related criminality.
Biden knowingly spread confidential documents holding state secrets across three states in six unguarded storage facilities.
Trump was president when he left office with the documents he allegedly concealed at his secret service-staffed guarded home, and which, allegedly, he has not surrendered willingly. Assertions that he was illegally in possession of confidential documents may or may not stand after the upcoming US Supreme Court’s ruling on this issue, which I believe will be favorable for Trump. If the court rules that he had all rights to the documents, and their disposition under the separation of powers clause, the case against him will be dismissed.
Biden, who has had no such privileges, has continually, repeatedly, arrogantly, and illegally transferred, conducted business with (with the aim to personally profit from), and continued to possess (with both intent and the knowledge of the crime), shared and possibly transmitted confidential information contained in some of these documents. It is now known that he pilfered them out of a SCIF while serving as a senator and veep. After leaving office, as a private citizen, Biden continued his criminal activities.
The directives for SCIF procedures with the penalties for violating them are posted at and inside every SCIF's entry.
Another significant takeaway point is the consideration of motive and intent – as well as the knowledge that prohibits the unauthorized possession and theft of marked “confidential” & “Top Secret” documents.
Biden informed his ghostwriter that he was in possession of these documents, about his willingness to share their contents, and warned him to not share this knowledge. An audio recording of this exchange is held by the DOJ.
While a private citizen Joe has willingly accepted at least in principle, and has allegedly received, $8 million for a book deal. To meet the obstruction questions over motive and intent, Biden had 8 million reasons to willfully retain documents he had no legal authority to retain, transfer or transport, or expose, for the offer of a fortune in greenbacks.
In full knowledge of the law, Joe illegally retained them anyway because he reportedly said, "I own them." Oh well, 18 million felonies, but then he’s a Democrat.
Unfortunately for Joe, the law does not provide exemptions for ignorance of the law, arrogance, theft of government secrets, age, constipation, the propensity to forget things, misspeaking, and stupidity.
As for the volume, 26 file boxes by my count, Trump's couple of thousand documents were piled in a locked storage room bathroom at the time of the Mar-a-Lago raid. They could arguably fit into the trunk of a car or SUV.
Biden's trove of the reported 18 million documents had to be removed in an 18-wheeler - a ship container.
Whether or not Biden is competent to undergo trial is not a prosecutor's decision, but a grand jury's. DOJ’s special counsel Jack Smith referred the Trump case to the Grand Jury. The Biden case will not go that route for obvious reasons, for the special counsel will have dismissed the charges before a grand jury might come to different conclusions than the DOJ had in mind.
Joe Biden's goons raided Mar-a-Lago to prosecute and persecute Trump for more or less the same and/or similar "crimes," for the "evidence," the transfer of which back to the Library of Congress was being negotiated at the time. They chose to cut off negotiations on purpose, to not warn Trump on purpose, and to raid Mar-a-Lago to publicly shame him, his family, his associates, in their attempt to incarcerate them all - on purpose.
They did not raid Biden under similar conditions, because they forewarned Biden to surrender the documents. They did not charge him with respect to 1. duration of possessing classified documents, 2. with the frequency of possessing classified documents, 3. the volume of possessing classified documents, and 4. under the condition whereas Presidential Immunity might be argued by a president, but certainly not by a senator, a veep, or a private citizen. They did not charge any of Biden’s associates, friends, and family with participation, collusion and conspiracy, for Biden’s greater series, severity and duration of the crimes alleged.
One can argue that Trump obstructed justice by invoking presidential privilege under the constitutional understanding of settled law, that he willingly retained "classified" documents.
One cannot argue that Biden was president for the years he continued to hold onto 1. or 2. or 3. to apply the justifications he has in 4, can one? However, in an irony of all hypocrisy, the media instructed by Clinton lawyers who were instrumental in the impeachment against Trump do just that, to continue to defend Biden, and maintain that a veep has the authority to declassify documents.
No one seems to have noticed the inconsistency.
Intent to commit crimes?
No one to the best of my knowledge offered Donald Trump $8 million to retain documents, information from which a book might be published to make the former president a profit.
The DOUBLE STANDARD for charging a former president while exonerating the one in power considering the latter’s greater crimes now being documented isn't just glaring, isn't just politically-motivated and disingenuous, unconstitutional, unlawful and unjust, isn't just beyond the pale (remember, Biden was not president!). It is a nuclear-class double standard misapplication of the law, malicious prosecution, prosecutorial abuse and misconduct, and law-warfare. It is an injustice that not only didn't and cannot save democracy (as the left cynically parrots that virtue-signalling which applies permission they grant only to themselves to violate law and decency), but is actually the very opposite:
Soros-Obama-Clinton-Biden (and on the other side of the pond, the European Parliament), have been in process of destroying democracy and their own institutions for a quarter of a century.
To fully understand of what I speak, take Frédéric Bastiat, 1801-1850, the post French Revolutionary philosopher, economist and legislator, who brings us up to date (from 200 years ago) explaining the very real present in a United States where the ones who cannot win at the polls use the full coercive power of the federal government, law-fare, the courts, media, academia, and the entertainment world, to destroy their opponents.
Please forward to 2 minutes for the jaw-dropping words:
The trend in the modern world described by Bastiat, ongoing for over two decades, has been treating Republicans and Democrats, law-abiding American and European people, disparately, contrary to law, morality, justice, decency, and in our case, the U.S. Constitution.
The left’s double standards pile the politics of character assassination onto their enemies, coupled to racist DEI and CRT initiatives, and the new antisemitism and post-colonialism, with which they have divided society worldwide. This agenda was established by Obama and Biden after 2008, and adopted in the European Parliament in 2010.
These two men have weaponized every US agency governed under the Executive Branch, the corporate culture and high tech, with propaganda and funding, and every institution of learning and law across the land. The executive branch, as well as academia and media, have been weaponized top-down with progressive operatives, to obstruct , conflate and confound every political issue, capture and dominate the legislative and judicial branches - meaning all three branches of the U.S. government - and turn the very law on its head.
The goal is to establish a one party, open-borders universalist political system and state hostile to its own history, greatness, success, its destiny, to create a globalist elite that will rule a dispirited America and Europe from top down. The goal is to fundamentally change, disarm its citizens, and ultimately eliminate the United States and who we are as we’ve known ourselves.
Tyranny is the use of law to violate, alter the meaning of words and understandings, confound, delegitimize, obstruct, and turn the law on its head. Thus, under the Obama-era, terrorism, and to blame former President Bush for hurricanes that occur naturally, became “man-made disasters”; and under Biden “illegal migrants” who bring a 100,000 fentanyl deaths to America every year became “newcomers.”
What you've read above is not the first shot across the bow of the sinking Titanic called the United States of America.
A few more years of the same, "democracy" and "election integrity" will be “saved” by the progressives having eliminated both, pursuant to Obama’s 2008 promises for America.
FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN
PLEASE RE-POST THE LINKS TO MY ESSAYS AT FACEBOOK, X-TWITTER, TRUTH, GETTR, MINDS, REDDIT, INSTAGRAM, DISCORD, RUMBLE, AND EMAIL FORWARD IT TO YOUR FRIENDS, MEDIA, and YOUR POLITICIANS!
Victor Davis Hansen: One Angry Biden Lie After Another
© Andrew G. Benjamin is in finance, real estate and equities, a former advisor to New York City mayor‘s office (Subcommittee on Taxation, Finance and the Budget). Benjamin wrote extensively about politics, transnational and domestic, intelligence and military affairs, security and strategy, economic issues, Mideast, terrorism, technology and high end audio.